Staffing after both sides have been examined
The original promise is still the promise: pair the client with the right Stackologist, and the Stackologist with a client worth the calendar.
Finding a qualified developer takes more than a résumé. A qualitative interview is not enough either. Each person we put forward has been examined for the competency your project will use, not the kitchen-sink list in the requisition.
What you receive
- A match score we will show you, tied to the technologies that will ship.
- A person who has already sat an examination for those technologies.
- A scorecard during the engagement so praise and correction are specific.
What we ask of you
A developer should not be burdened by a lengthy tech-stack list they will never touch. If the posting says Kubernetes and the work is an MVC site on SQL Server, the posting is the defect. We will say that before anyone starts.
When we walk away
If a match does not exist, we do not force a relationship. That is cheaper for you than a ninety-day dud, and it is the only way the name on this domain stays honest.
Questions we actually get
Do you place people who have not been examined for this stack?
No. A Stackologist is scored against the technologies that will actually ship on the engagement. A generalist résumé is not enough.
What if you do not have a match?
We say so and stop. We do not fill a seat to keep a pipeline moving. A forced match costs you more than an empty week.
Do you only staff, or do you also build?
Both. Some clients want a person inside their team. Others want us to own a slice of product. The vetting is the same; the contract is different.